From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeGroat v. New York Central Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

April, 1932.


Order granting motion to change the place of trial from Kings county to Rockland county reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The record shows, undenied, several places in the county of Kings where the defendant conducts the business of receiving and discharging freight and selling tickets. The claim of the respondent that it does not operate its railroad in Kings county in so far as concerns the presence of tracks, cars and locomotives, is not determinative. A railroad company conducting business in a particular county must be deemed a resident of that county for the purpose of laying venue. ( Pond v. Hudson River Railroad Co., 17 How. Pr. 543; Poland v. United Traction Co., 88 App. Div. 281, 283; affd. on opinion below, 177 N.Y. 557.) Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DeGroat v. New York Central Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

DeGroat v. New York Central Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:ANNA L. DeGROAT, as Administratrix, etc., of CHARLES H. DeGROAT, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Ray v. Bee Line, Inc.

( Finch School v. Finch, 144 A.D. 687 [2d Dept.]; General Baking Co. v. Daniell, 181 A.D. 501 [4th Dept.];…