From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Degoto v. Hogan

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 20, 2023
No. 22-6944 (4th Cir. Jan. 20, 2023)

Opinion

22-6944

01-20-2023

DANIEL PATRICK DEGOTO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; LT. GOVERNOR BOYD K. RUTHERFORD; SECRETARY ROBERT N. NEAL; DETECTIVE KROUCH; STATE'S ATTORNEY SCOTT D. SHELLENBERGER; PERCY WASSERMAN, Assistant State's Attorney; DIANNA E. ABRAMOWSKI; KIM METCALF; COLLEEN A. CAVANAUGH; JUDGE ENSOR; JUDGE HOLLANDER; ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE COX; ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JAKUBOWSKI; CLERK STEPHON JOE; PUBLIC DEFENDER DEWOLFE; TANYA C. BERNSTEIN, Maryland Commission on Judicial Disability Director; FUCETOLA, Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission Counsel; PICCININI, Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission Counsel; ROBIN WOOLFORD; WILLIAM BOHRER, Warden; OFFICER T. LEACH; OFFICER SHANNON SINGLETON; NURSE ELIZABETH; DOCTOR CONTAH NIMELY; CLAUDIA HOWARD; GEORGETTE G. HUGHES, Defendants - Appellees.

Daniel Patrick Degoto, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: January 17, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (1:22-cv-00057-PJM)

Daniel Patrick Degoto, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Patrick Degoto seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing some, but not all, of the Defendants named in Degoto's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Degoto seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny Degoto's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Degoto v. Hogan

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 20, 2023
No. 22-6944 (4th Cir. Jan. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Degoto v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL PATRICK DEGOTO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; LT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 20, 2023

Citations

No. 22-6944 (4th Cir. Jan. 20, 2023)