Opinion
06-CV-6442L
01-20-2012
MICHAEL A. DEFRANCO and MICHELLE ENGELR, Plaintiffs, v. THE TOWN OF IRONDEQUOIT, et al., Defendants.
DECISION AND ORDER
By decision and order entered in November 2009 (Dkt. #50), this Court affirmed Magistrate Judge Payson's decision (Dkt. #40) denying plaintiffs' request to compel disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant who provided information which was contained in an application for a search warrant.
Now, two years after this Court's decision, plaintiffs move (Dkt. #57) for "relief" from the Court's prior decision of November 16, 2009 (Dkt. #50). In essence, the motion is one for reconsideration.
Plaintiffs' motion (Dkt. #57) is in all respects denied. To the extent the plaintiff has other issues relating to the scope of discovery, those matters should be raised with Magistrate Judge Payson who is charged with supervising such discovery.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________
DAVID G. LARIMER
United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York
January 20, 2012.