From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeFilippo v. Plaza Sea, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued December 1, 2000.

December 27, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for false imprisonment, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), entered August 11, 1999, which, inter alia, granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Ahmed "Sam" Elsayed on the ground that jurisdiction was not acquired over that defendant.

Gary R. DeFilippo, Staten Island, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Lester Schwab Katz Dwyer, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Steven B. Prystowsky of counsel), for respondents.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the plaintiff failed to comply with CPLR 308(2), the purported service of the summons was ineffective to acquire jurisdiction over the defendant Ahmed "Sam" Elsayed (see, Macchia v. Russo, 67 N.Y.2d 592; Feinstein v. Bergner, 48 N.Y.2d 234; Citibank, N.A. v. Harris, 264 A.D.2d 377; Wern v. D'Alessandro, 219 A.D.2d 646, 647). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant.


Summaries of

DeFilippo v. Plaza Sea, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

DeFilippo v. Plaza Sea, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARY R. DeFILIPPO, APPELLANT, v. PLAZA SEA, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 911

Citing Cases

Golden Eagle Capital Corp. v. Paramount Mgt. Corp.

Here, in support of those branches of the motion of Fong and Zhang which were pursuant to CPLR 317 and…