From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DEFENDANT ID NO. 93204680DI

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Jul 25, 2006
(Del. Super. Ct. Jul. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Decided: July 25, 2006.

Bobby Foreman, Greenwood, DE.


Dear Mr. Foreman:

On May 3, 2006, you filed a Motion for Postconviction Relief pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61. You have served your time and been discharged from your sentence.

Since you are no longer in custody nor are you subject to future custody, relief pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 is not available. Epperson v. State, 829 A.2d 935 (Del. 2003); Summers v. State, 818 A.2d 971 (Del. 2003); Fullman v. State, 746 A.2d 276 (Del. 2000); Guinn v. State, Del. Supr., No. 549, 1992, Walsh, J. (April 21, 1993); Petsinger v. State, Del. Super., Def. ID#9605020352, Graves, J. (June 28, 2002); State v. Beles, Del. Super., Cr. A. No. 96-06-0468, Graves, J. (March 13, 1997).

Your Motion for Postconviction Relief is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

DEFENDANT ID NO. 93204680DI

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Jul 25, 2006
(Del. Super. Ct. Jul. 25, 2006)
Case details for

DEFENDANT ID NO. 93204680DI

Case Details

Full title:Defendant ID No. 93204680DI (R-2) Motion for Postconviction Relief

Court:Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County

Date published: Jul 25, 2006

Citations

(Del. Super. Ct. Jul. 25, 2006)