From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deese v. Brown

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Feb 13, 1964
161 So. 2d 108 (La. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 10127.

February 13, 1964.

APPEAL FROM FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE JOHN A. DIXON, JR., J.

Lunn, Irion, Switzer, Trichel Johnson, Shreveport, for appellant.

Isaac F. Hawkins, Jr., Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellee.

Melvin L. Bellar, Marion Weimer, James A. Piper, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

Before HARDY, GLADNEY and BOLIN, JJ.


This is a suit for unemployment benefits, and defendant-employer appeals from judgment on judicial review in favor of claimant.

The case involves the usual questions, first, as to whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the Administrative Tribunals, and, second, whether the actions of the claimant constituted misconduct as legally defined.

The alleged misconduct in this case concerns the failure of the employee, after a period of disability due to a compensable injury, to report to his employer for work. The identical question has been presented to this court and decided in the case of Walker v. Brown, Administrator, 160 So.2d 258. As observed in the Walker case, an employee cannot be said to "leave `his employment without good cause'" when he terminates such employment because of injuries received on the job.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant's cost.


Summaries of

Deese v. Brown

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Feb 13, 1964
161 So. 2d 108 (La. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Deese v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN DEESE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. RICHARD E. BROWN, JR., ADMINISTRATOR…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 1964

Citations

161 So. 2d 108 (La. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Napoleon v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security

Here, the employee was hurt on the job, the employer knew the reason for the absence over an extended period…