From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deere v. Borders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 26, 2018
Case No. 5:18-cv-00160-R-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5:18-cv-00160-R-KES

07-26-2018

ARTHUR RAY DEERE, SR., Petitioner, v. BORDERS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 14). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. (Dkt. 15.) The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) DISMISSING the Petition without prejudice to Petitioner asserting his claims relating to medical treatment in a subsequent action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and (2) DENYING // leave to amend the Petition to assert the habeas claims contained in the "Ad[d]endum" at Docket Number 12, pages nos. 24-41. DATED: July 26, 2018

/s/_________

HON. MANUEL L. REAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Deere v. Borders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 26, 2018
Case No. 5:18-cv-00160-R-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Deere v. Borders

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR RAY DEERE, SR., Petitioner, v. BORDERS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 26, 2018

Citations

Case No. 5:18-cv-00160-R-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2018)