From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deepdale Gen. v. Am. Colonial

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 19, 1989
144 Misc. 2d 917 (N.Y. App. Term 1989)

Opinion

October 19, 1989

Appeal from the District Court, Nassau County, Zelda Jonas, J.

Mardon R. Israel for appellant.

Cally Cally (George R. Cally of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment unanimously modified by increasing the recovery to $518.63, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to plaintiff.

In this action for no-fault first-party benefits, the required forms were sent to the defendant carrier on March 2, 1988. The action herein was commenced by the service of a summons and complaint on the Superintendent of Insurance on April 18, 1988. Defendant paid the bill plus interest on April 26th and the summons and complaint were filed with the court on May 16, 1988. The lower court held that since the summons and complaint were not filed until after payment of the claim, that service was not "completed" until that time (see, UDCA 410 [b]) and therefore payment of the claim was made prior to the "commencement" of this action. We disagree.

Section 1212 Ins. of the Insurance Law provides that the Superintendent of Insurance is designated as the attorney for an insurer doing business in this State and that said Superintendent is authorized to accept process for the insurer. UDCA 2102 provides that provisions as to practice and procedure of the CPLR are applicable to the District Court. CPLR 304 provides that an "action is commenced and jurisdiction [is] acquired by service of a summons" (emphasis added). While UDCA 410 (b) provides that service is not complete until the summons is filed with the court, said section merely sets forth the time when a defendant must answer the summons and not to when the action is "commenced" (see, Siegel, Commentary on Revision, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, CCA 410, at 116). Therefore, payment of this claim was not made prior to the commencement of this action. Consequently, the provisions of 11 NYCRR 65.16 (c) (8) (iv) apply to the establishment of counsel fees, and under this regulation, the fee is 20% of the amount of first-party benefits plus interest. That amounts to $518.63 and judgment in that sum should be entered in plaintiff's favor.

DIPAOLA, P.J., GEILER and COLLINS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Deepdale Gen. v. Am. Colonial

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 19, 1989
144 Misc. 2d 917 (N.Y. App. Term 1989)
Case details for

Deepdale Gen. v. Am. Colonial

Case Details

Full title:DEEPDALE GENERAL HOSPITAL, as Assignee of IMTIAZ A. RANA et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1989

Citations

144 Misc. 2d 917 (N.Y. App. Term 1989)
550 N.Y.S.2d 526

Citing Cases

Linden v. State-Wide Ins Co.

"Personal service" establishes the power of the court over the defendant; "personal delivery" in this…

N.Y. Med. Rehab., P.C. v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Service of the summons was complete upon filing proof of service (CCA former 410[b] ), or, in the case of…