From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DEEM v. DOUGHTY

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Jul 7, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:03cv571 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:03cv571.

July 7, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff Steven Deem, an inmate at the Stiles Unit, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against David Doughty, Thomas R. McKee, Tracy P. Allen, Jody Hatch, Debra Harrell, Danina C. Jones, Paul Morrell, N. Sherman, Casi Doughty, Erik J. Tolpo, Dr. Charles Wilson, and P. Foy.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends plaintiff's motion to dismiss his claims against defendant N. Sherman be granted.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A partial judgment shall be entered in accordance with this memorandum.

So ORDERED and SIGNED.


Summaries of

DEEM v. DOUGHTY

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Jul 7, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:03cv571 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2006)
Case details for

DEEM v. DOUGHTY

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN DEEM v. DAVID DOUGHTY, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Jul 7, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:03cv571 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2006)