From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DEEM v. BBT CORPORATION

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Jul 17, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-00343 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-00343.

July 17, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Pending before the court is the plaintiff's motion to remand [Docket 7]. Though the memorandum accompanying the plaintiff's motion violates this court's local rules for page limitation, I have considered the plaintiff's arguments set forth in that memorandum. Because most, if not all, of the plaintiff's grounds for relief are preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, this court has subject-matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, I DENY the plaintiff's motion to remand. I do, however, GRANT the plaintiff leave to respond to the defendants' pending motion to dismiss within fourteen days; the defendants may then file a reply if necessary.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.


Summaries of

DEEM v. BBT CORPORATION

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Jul 17, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-00343 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 17, 2006)
Case details for

DEEM v. BBT CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:BERNICE DEEM, Plaintiff, v. BBT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division

Date published: Jul 17, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-00343 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 17, 2006)