From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deegan v. State

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 10, 2021
2:19-cv-02219-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-02219-TLN-AC

09-10-2021

SIDNEY ROSS DEEGAN, III, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Sidney Ross Deegan, III (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 9, 2021 (ECF No. 10), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the May 11, 2021 Screening Order (ECF No. 8). See E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Deegan v. State

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 10, 2021
2:19-cv-02219-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Deegan v. State

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY ROSS DEEGAN, III, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-02219-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)