From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deegan v. Borough of Stone Harbor Planning Bd.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 18, 2022
No. A-2991-20 (App. Div. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

A-2991-20

10-18-2022

CHARLES DEEGAN and MARIE DEEGAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR PLANNING BOARD and CHARLES STREET DEVELOPERS, LLC, Defendants-Respondents. RKH HOLDINGS, LLC, WILLIAM S. ROOHAN, LYNN D. ROOHAN, CRAIG OTTON, PATRICIA K. DIMARCO-SHESTON, STEPHEN M. HARBAUGH, JEFFREY RIHN, and BERNADETTE M. PARZYCH, Plaintiffs, v. BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR PLANNING BOARD and CHARLES STREET DEVELOPERS, LLC, Defendants-Respondents.

Fox Rothschild, LLP, attorneys for appellants (Jack Plackter and Amanda Moscillo, on the briefs). Craig, Annin & Baxter, LLP, attorneys for respondent Borough of Stone Harbor Planning Board (John C. Grady, on the brief). Hankin, Sandman Palladino Weintrob & Bell, PC, attorneys for respondent Charles Street Developers, LLC (Colin G. Bell, on the brief).


This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Submitted October 11, 2022.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Cape May County, Docket Nos. L-0098-20 and L-0110-20.

Fox Rothschild, LLP, attorneys for appellants (Jack Plackter and Amanda Moscillo, on the briefs).

Craig, Annin & Baxter, LLP, attorneys for respondent Borough of Stone Harbor Planning Board (John C. Grady, on the brief).

Hankin, Sandman Palladino Weintrob & Bell, PC, attorneys for respondent Charles Street Developers, LLC (Colin G. Bell, on the brief).

Before Mayer, Enright, and Bishop-Thompson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

The court being advised by the parties in the above matter that the issues in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.


Summaries of

Deegan v. Borough of Stone Harbor Planning Bd.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 18, 2022
No. A-2991-20 (App. Div. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Deegan v. Borough of Stone Harbor Planning Bd.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES DEEGAN and MARIE DEEGAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

No. A-2991-20 (App. Div. Oct. 18, 2022)