From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deeb v. Adams

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 17, 1970
315 F. Supp. 1299 (N.D. Fla. 1970)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 1614.

July 17, 1970.

F. Perry Odom, Ervin, Pennington, Varn Jacobs, Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff.

Ronald W. Sabo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant.

Before SIMPSON, Circuit Judge and SCOTT and ARNOW, District Judges.


OPINION AND JUDGMENT


The Defendant, Secretary of State of Florida, has refused to allow Plaintiff, a Florida state Senator, to qualify as a candidate for another state office, the term of which is in part concurrent with his present senatorial term, without resigning his office as required by Chapter 70-80, Laws of Florida. The facts are undisputed.

Plaintiff seeks relief from this Court contending that his federal Constitutional First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and expression and his Fourteenth Amendment rights of equal protection and due process have been violated by the Defendant in his construction of this so-called "resign to run law."

We have considered these claims and hold that this law is valid against the constitutional challenges made against it by this candidate for state office in this suit. See Stack v. Adams, D.C., 315 F. Supp. 1295, decided by this Court today, for reasons set forth in more detail.

This suit is, accordingly, dismissed with prejudice at the cost of the Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Deeb v. Adams

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 17, 1970
315 F. Supp. 1299 (N.D. Fla. 1970)
Case details for

Deeb v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:Richard J. DEEB, Plaintiff, v. Tom ADAMS, as Secretary of the State of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jul 17, 1970

Citations

315 F. Supp. 1299 (N.D. Fla. 1970)

Citing Cases

Morial v. Judiciary Commission of Louisiana

413 U.S. at 607 n. 5, 93 S.Ct. at 2913. Several lower federal courts have rejected equal protection…

Stack v. Adams

The challenge on the ground of violation of and conflict with the qualifications section of the United States…