From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dedrick v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Sep 30, 2010
Case No. 1:08-cv-00044 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-cv-00044.

September 30, 2010


ORDER


Pending before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18) ("Plaintiff's Motion"), the Social Security Administration's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 25) ("Defendant's Motion"), to which Plaintiff filed a Reply Brief (Doc. No. 29) ("Reply"). Subsequently, Magistrate Judge Griffin issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32) ("Report") finding that, "the Commissioner's determination that the plaintiff could perform work at the light level of exertion (tr. 21) during the relevant time period is supposed by substantial evidence in the record as required by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)." Id. at 1. Magistrate Judge Bryant recommended that Plaintiff's Motion be denied and that the Social Security Administration's decision be affirmed. Id. at 31. The Report was filed on August 20, 2010, and neither party has raised any objections to date.

Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's Motion, GRANTS Defendant's Motion, and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner.

It is so ORDERED.

Entered this 30th day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Dedrick v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Sep 30, 2010
Case No. 1:08-cv-00044 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Dedrick v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TAMMIE LYNN DEDRICK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:08-cv-00044 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 30, 2010)