From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Decker v. Hogan

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 2, 2010
9:09-CV-239 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2010)

Opinion

9:09-CV-239.

September 2, 2010


DECISION ORDER


This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to the Report-Recommendation dated June 16, 2010 have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. Furthermore, after examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein.

It is therefore,

ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 17) is GRANTED and the and the complaint is DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS CHANGE OF ADDRESS AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: September 1, 2010


Summaries of

Decker v. Hogan

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 2, 2010
9:09-CV-239 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Decker v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. DECKER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL F. HOGAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 2, 2010

Citations

9:09-CV-239 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2010)

Citing Cases

James v. Fischer

Further, inasmuch at the plaintiff has failed to provide the Court with a current address, any attempt to…