From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deck R. v. Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 6, 2021
19-CV-10490 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-10490 (RA)

08-06-2021

DECK R., Plaintiff, v. HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

It has been reported to the Court that the parties have reached a resolution in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirtyday period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Deck R. v. Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 6, 2021
19-CV-10490 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Deck R. v. Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield

Case Details

Full title:DECK R., Plaintiff, v. HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD and DOES 1 through…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 6, 2021

Citations

19-CV-10490 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)