Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

DECISIONS W/O PUBLISHED OPINIONS

837 So. 2d 886 (Ala. Crim. App. 2001)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
DECISIONS W/O PUBLISHED OPINIONS

2 Citing cases

  1. Campbell v. State

    883 So. 2d 1271 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003)   Cited 2 times

    In that petition, he claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective and that the trial court was without jurisdiction to render a judgment or to impose sentence. The circuit court dismissed his petition, and its judgment was affirmed on appeal. Campbell v. State, (No. CR-00-0129), 837 So.2d 886 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001) (table). Campbell filed the instant petition on January 6, 2003.

  2. Bell v. State

    845 So. 2d 856 (Ala. Crim. App. 2002)   Cited 5 times
    In Bell v. State, 845 So.2d 856 (Ala.Crim.App.2002), we addressed the facts that are required to sufficiently plead a claim involving flaws in the chain of custody.

    On appeal, Bell's counsel filed a no-merit brief, and this Court affirmed Bell's conviction and sentence in an unpublished memorandum. Bell v. State, (No. CR-00-0393) 837 So.2d 886 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001) (table). On May 11, 2001, Bell filed a Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition.