Summary
finding that requiring Plaintiff to have a formal diagnosis of mental retardation to meet or equal Listing 12.05 was "an improper interpretation of the legal standard"
Summary of this case from Labarge v. ColvinOpinion
8:06-CV-488 (LEK/VEB).
June 17, 2009
DECISION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on May 28, 2009, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(d) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 15).
Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to the Report-Recommendation filed by Judge Bianchini. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is REMANDED to the Commissioner for a calculation of benefits; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.