Opinion
December 9, 1977
Appeal from the Monroe Supreme Court.
Present — Moule, J.P., Cardamone, Simons, Hancock, Jr., and Denman, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: In an action for personal injuries to the infant plaintiff, default judgment was entered in Supreme Court, Monroe County, in December, 1976 and set aside on motion of the defendant. We find that it was an improvident exercise of discretion to vacate the judgment, and we therefore reverse and reinstate the judgment entered December 27, 1976. The record is lacking facts which would establish excusable neglect, mistake or inadvertence (United Ind. Corp. v Shreiber, 51 A.D.2d 688, mot for lv to app den 39 N.Y.2d 1015, cert den 429 U.S. 1023; Charles v Glens Falls Ins., Co., 38 A.D.2d 669; Treo Enterprises v O'Neill, 36 A.D.2d 541) and is similarly devoid of facts constituting a meritorious defense or a proposed answer (Wall v Bennett, 33 A.D.2d 827; 418 Trading Corp. v Pelliccio, 13 A.D.2d 804; Heller v Ward, 10 A.D.2d 633). Further, defendant's attempt to establish lack of personal jurisdiction falls far short of the showing necessary to sustain defendant's burden in an action to set aside a default judgment (1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac, par 306.10). Defendant's bare statement that he did not receive and was not served with a summons and complaint is insufficient to contest jurisdiction and "does not rise to the status of excusable default since he does not contend that the method of substituted service was not proper". (National Commercial Bank Trust Co. v Ross, 40 A.D.2d 1046.)