Summary
In DeCandia v Hudson Waterways (130 A.D.2d 352, 353), the court affirmed, without opinion, but added that it could perceive no reason for petitioner's "inordinate" delay (3 years and 10 months) in deciding the motion to dismiss the third-party complaint (id., at 353).
Summary of this case from Matter of GreenfieldOpinion
May 5, 1987
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on October 27, 1986, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We perceive no reason for the inordinate delay on the part of Special Term in deciding the motion.
Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Smith, JJ.