Opinion
No. 13-73573
12-14-2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Agency No. A027-251-462 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Rudolph Decambra, a native and citizen of Guyana, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency's factual findings. Arbid v. Holder, 700 F.3d 379, 385-86 (9th Cir. 2012). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency's denial of Decambra's CAT claim because Decambra failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guyana. See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2013). We reject Decambra's contention that the BIA did not consider Decambra's news article or all of the country report.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.