From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Debellis v. Schmoke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 5, 2021
19 CIVIL 7834 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 7834 (PMH)

01-05-2021

ANTHONY F. DEBELLIS, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN SCHMOKE, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 5, 2021, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's AC in its entirety. While "[d]istrict courts should frequently provide leave to amend before dismissing a pro se complaint . . . leave to amend is not necessary when it would be futile." Reed v. Friedman Mgt. Corp., 541 F. App'x 40, 41 (2d Cir. 2013) (citing Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000)). Here, Plaintiff has already had one opportunity to amend his Complaint and has not sought leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. Furthermore, any amendment would be futile as Plaintiff cannot establish lack of probable cause and Plaintiff's remaining claims for relief are flawed as a matter of law; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

January 5, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Debellis v. Schmoke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 5, 2021
19 CIVIL 7834 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Debellis v. Schmoke

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY F. DEBELLIS, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN SCHMOKE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 5, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 7834 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2021)