From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deaton v. John Doe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 29, 2016
631 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-7413

01-29-2016

WILLIAM DEATON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER JOHN DOE, a/k/a Officer Thomas; LT JOHN DOE, a/k/a Lt Clauson; LT JOHN DOE, a/k/a Lt Vetter; SGT JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Nurse; JANE DOE, Nurse; SGT JANE DOE; SGT JANE DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE; OFFICER JOHN DOE; JOHN DOE, Nurse; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; LCDC MEDICAL PROVIDER; JOHN DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

William Deaton, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-00276-GRA-MGB) Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Deaton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Deaton appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deaton v. Officer John Doe, No. 2:15-cv-00276-GRA-MGB (D.S.C. June 24 & Aug. 4, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Deaton v. John Doe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 29, 2016
631 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Deaton v. John Doe

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM DEATON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER JOHN DOE, a/k/a Officer…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 29, 2016

Citations

631 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2016)