From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dearwester v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 25, 2017
No. 2:13-cv-2064 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-2064 MCE DB P

05-25-2017

FRANK LEE DEARWESTER, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested appointment of counsel. Plaintiff contends he requires the appointment of counsel because he suffers several psychiatric disorders, he is uneducated in the law, and the prison law library is inaccessible and inadequate.

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).

The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Circumstances common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not establish exceptional circumstances that would warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel. In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances.

The court is concerned, however, about plaintiff's assertion that the prison law library is inaccessible and inadequate. While these assertions do not form a basis for the appointment of counsel, plaintiff should inform the court, with specificity, if he is not receiving access to the library and explain why it is inadequate.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 79) is denied. Dated: May 25, 2017

/s/_________

DEBORAH BARNES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/dear2064.31


Summaries of

Dearwester v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 25, 2017
No. 2:13-cv-2064 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Dearwester v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

Case Details

Full title:FRANK LEE DEARWESTER, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 25, 2017

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-2064 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2017)