From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DeArmond v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Apr 1, 1925
147 N.E. 923 (Ind. 1925)

Opinion

No. 24,324.

Filed April 1, 1925.

INTOXICATING LIQUORS. — Affidavit charging possession alone does not state an offense. — An affidavit charging the possession of intoxicating liquor does not state an offense, and a motion to quash should be sustained.

From Fayette Circuit Court; E. Ralph Himelick, Judge.

Marshall DeArmond was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Reversed.

Donald L. Smith, for appellant.

U.S. Lesh, Attorney-General, and Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Deputy Attorney-General, for the State.


The affidavit on which appellant was prosecuted charged that on October 23, 1922, at Fayette county, Indiana, he had in his possession three gallons of white mule whisky, which was alleged to be intoxicating liquor. The motion to quash the affidavit should have been sustained. Powell v. State (1923), 193 Ind. 258, 139 N.E. 670.

The judgment is reversed, with directions to quash the affidavit.


Summaries of

DeArmond v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Apr 1, 1925
147 N.E. 923 (Ind. 1925)
Case details for

DeArmond v. State

Case Details

Full title:DeARMOND v. STATE OF INDIANA

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Apr 1, 1925

Citations

147 N.E. 923 (Ind. 1925)
147 N.E. 923