Opinion
Civil Action 19-2642-KSM
02-01-2022
JESSICA DEARDORFF, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER
KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.
AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2022, following jurisdictional discovery and upon consideration of Defendant Cellular Sales of Knoxville, Inc.'s (“CSOKI”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 65), the parties' supplemental briefing (Doc. Nos. 142, 147), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that CSOKI's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Doc. No. 65) is GRANTED and CSOKI is DISMISSED as a defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 146), Defendant Cellular Sales of Pennsylvania's (“CSPA”) response (Doc. No. 148), and Plaintiffs' reply (Doc. No. 149), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiffs' motion (Doc. No. 146) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.