From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dearce v. Bixian Wu

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Dec 10, 2021
No. 2021-51209 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 10, 2021)

Opinion

2021-51209

12-10-2021

Sylvia L. Dearce, Respondent, v. Bixian Wu, Appellant.

Bixian Wu, appellant pro se. Sylvia L. Dearce, respondent pro se (no brief filed).


Unpublished Opinion

Bixian Wu, appellant pro se.

Sylvia L. Dearce, respondent pro se (no brief filed).

PRESENT:: DAVID ELLIOT, J.P., MICHELLE WESTON, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ira R. Greenberg, J.), entered March 21, 2019. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $3,012 and dismissed defendant's counterclaim.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this small claims action against defendant, her former landlord, to recover the sum of $3,460 for property damage, failure to return property and loss of property. Defendant interposed a counterclaim seeking $5,000 for property damage and failure to pay rent. Following a nonjury trial, the Civil Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $3,012 and dismissed the counterclaim. Defendant appeals.

In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has... been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; see CCA 1804; Ross v Friedman, 269 A.D.2d 584 [2000]; Williams v Roper, 269 A.D.2d 125 [2000]). The determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (see Vizzari v State of New York, 184 A.D.2d 564 [1992]; Kincade v Kincade, 178 A.D.2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (see Williams v Roper, 269 A.D.2d at 126).

As the court's determination is supported by the record and provides the parties with substantial justice (see CCA 1804, 1807), the judgment is affirmed.

ELLIOT, J.P., WESTON and GOLIA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dearce v. Bixian Wu

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Dec 10, 2021
No. 2021-51209 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Dearce v. Bixian Wu

Case Details

Full title:Sylvia L. Dearce, Respondent, v. Bixian Wu, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Dec 10, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-51209 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 10, 2021)