admitting psychiatrists' testimony that defendant had admitted the offenses with which he was charged, "where the evidence was admitted not for the purpose of showing guilt, but to cross-examine and test the psychiatrists as to the bases for their expert opinions"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. BartlettNo. 83-6595.
October 1, 1984.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 728 F. 2d 107.
admitting psychiatrists' testimony that defendant had admitted the offenses with which he was charged, "where the evidence was admitted not for the purpose of showing guilt, but to cross-examine and test the psychiatrists as to the bases for their expert opinions"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Bartlettapplying Pearce where a defendant's case was remanded solely for resentencing on one count of his conviction
Summary of this case from Somerville v. HuntFull title:DEANGELIS v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 1, 1984
ense admissible under the requirements of 404(b) "[u]nless barred by the Fourth Amendment," and remanding for…
U.S. v. Fuentes2. Lesser-Included Offense A § 846 conspiracy is a lesser-included offense of a CCE. United States v.…