From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deane v. Marshalls, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Aug 30, 2011
Record No. 1052-11-2 (Va. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Record No. 1052-11-2

08-30-2011

ALICE M. DEANE v. MARSHALLS, INC. AND AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA

(Alice M. Deane, pro se, on brief.) (C. Ervin Reid; S. Virginia Bondurant; Goodman, Allen & Filetti, on brief), for appellees.


Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Alice M. Deane, pro se, on brief.)

(C. Ervin Reid; S. Virginia Bondurant; Goodman, Allen & Filetti, on brief), for appellees.

Alice M. Deane appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding her claim for benefits for psychological conditions is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Deane v. Marshalls, Inc., VWC File No. 219-35-94 (May 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Deane v. Marshalls, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Aug 30, 2011
Record No. 1052-11-2 (Va. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Deane v. Marshalls, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALICE M. DEANE v. MARSHALLS, INC. AND AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

Record No. 1052-11-2 (Va. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2011)