From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean v. Wong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-2152 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2152 KJN P

10-05-2011

ALTON E. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. E. WONG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Plaintiff has also filed a motion for summary judgment. This motion is premature as no defendants have been served or otherwise appeared in this action. For this reason, plaintiff's motion is denied without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's August 12, 2011 motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 2)is denied without prejudice;

2. Plaintiff's October 3, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 9) is denied.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Dean v. Wong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-2152 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Dean v. Wong

Case Details

Full title:ALTON E. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. E. WONG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2152 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)