From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean v. Wong

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 6, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-2152 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2152 KJN P.

October 6, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Plaintiff has also filed a motion for summary judgment. This motion is premature as no defendants have been served or otherwise appeared in this action. For this reason, plaintiff's motion is denied without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's August 12, 2011 motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 2) is denied without prejudice;

2. Plaintiff's October 3, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 9) is denied.

DATED: October 5, 2011


Summaries of

Dean v. Wong

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 6, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-2152 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Dean v. Wong

Case Details

Full title:ALTON E. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. E. WONG, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2152 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)