From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean v. Tony Spiak Auto Body

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 2003
2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 51435 (N.Y. App. Term 2003)

Opinion

2003-61 D C.

Decided October 23, 2003.

Appeal by defendant from a small claims judgment of the Justice Court, Town of LaGrange, Dutchess County (E. Caplicki, Jr.), entered October 31, 2002, in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,900 and dismissing its counterclaim.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: DOYLE, P.J., RUDOLPH and SKELOS, JJ.


Plaintiff commenced the instant small claims action, sounding in conversion, based on defendant's failure to repair and return his vehicle. Defendant counterclaimed for repair services rendered. While generally a registered motor vehicle garage which "tows, stores, maintains, keeps or repairs" a motor vehicle with the consent of the owner has a lien upon the motor vehicle for the sum due for repair services performed thereon (Lien Law § 184), when, as in the instant case, there is no agreed-upon price for the repairs, a motor vehicle repair shop may only avail itself of this statute where it is established that the charges were reasonable for the services rendered ( see Continental Ins. Co. v. Consumer Towing Collision, 189 Misc 2d 172). Defendant failed to establish that the charges for the repairs it rendered were reasonable since it submitted two bills for different sums ($3,500 and $5,212.85) allegedly representing the reasonable value of the repairs. As such, defendant had no valid mechanic's lien and once plaintiff requested the return of his vehicle, defendant's act of not complying with said request constituted conversion ( see Heneghan v. Cap-A-Radiator Shops, 132 Misc 2d 936). In light of the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the lower court's award of $2,900 in favor of plaintiff representing the reasonable value of plaintiff's vehicle and dismissing the counterclaim rendered substantial justice between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law ( see UJCA 1807).


Summaries of

Dean v. Tony Spiak Auto Body

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 2003
2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 51435 (N.Y. App. Term 2003)
Case details for

Dean v. Tony Spiak Auto Body

Case Details

Full title:JACK CAMERON DEAN, Respondent, v. TONY SPIAK AUTO BODY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 2003

Citations

2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 51435 (N.Y. App. Term 2003)

Citing Cases

People v. Krimitsos

Absent that consent or request, or absent proper licensing, there is no lien ( see Lien Law § 184, [4]; see…