From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean v. Capozza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 20, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-41 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-41 Erie

03-20-2013

FREDRICK D. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. WARNED MARK V. CAPOZZA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on February 8, 2013, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

Initially Magistrate Judge Baxter issued an Order dated February 11, 2013, denying Petitioner's Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and ordering Petitioner to pay the filing fee on or before February 26, 2013. ECF No. 2. No filing fee was received by the Clerk of Courts by the due date, and therefore on March 5, 2013, Magistrate Judge Baxter issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 3. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by March 22, 2013.

On March 6, 2013, the Clerk of Courts received Petitioner's filing fee. ECF No. 5. On March 11, 2013, Petitioner's Habeas Petition was filed, ECF No. 6.

On March 19, 2013, Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. ECF No. 7. In his Objections, Petitioner notes that the filing fee has been paid and explains that on February 15, 2013, he requested the Prison to issue a cheek for this purpose, but that the Prison delayed in ensuring that the filing fee was paid.

Although later than ordered, the filing fee in this case has been paid. The documentation Petitioner has provided presumptively shows that he did promptly request to have a check issued for the purposes of the filing fee. Under these circumstances and in the interest of justice we cannot say that Petitioner has failed to prosecute his case such that dismissal of the case is warranted.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and Objections thereto, we dismiss as moot Magistrate Judge Baxter's March 5, 2013 Report and Recommendation, and permit this case to proceed.

Accordingly, the following Order is hereby entered.

AND NOW, this 20th of March, 2013, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Report and Recommendation dated March 5, 2013 (ECF No. 3) is dismissed as moot.

____________________

Maurice B. Cohill, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge
cc: Counsel of Record

Frederick D. Dean, pro se

JR-0077

SCI PITTSBURGH

PO BOX 99991

PITTSBURGH, PA 15233


Summaries of

Dean v. Capozza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 20, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-41 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Dean v. Capozza

Case Details

Full title:FREDRICK D. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. WARNED MARK V. CAPOZZA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-41 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2013)