Dean v. Bragdon

3 Citing cases

  1. Dean v. Bragdon

    No. CV-2018-195 (Me. Super. May. 14, 2022)

    In the court's view, Dean's alleged cause of action is not one for "malicious prosecution," but rather is more properly characterized as a claim for "wrongful use of civil proceedings." See Pepperell Trust Co. v.Mountain Heir Fin. Corp., 1998 ME 46, ¶¶ 16-17, 708 A.2d 651. Dean filed this action on November 13, 2018, several months after this court issued its Decision and Judgment in the matter of Dean v. Bragdon, KEN-Dkt. No. CV-2016-229 (April 17, 2018) (Stokes, J.). In that matter, Ms. Dean sought a declaration that she held the right, title and interest in certain real estate in Vassalboro.

  2. Dean v. Bragdon

    Civil Action CV-2018-195 (Me. Super. May. 13, 2022)

    Before the court are several motions in what has become protracted litigation between these parties. By way of background, in Dean v. Bragdon, KEN-CV-2016229 (April 17, 2018) (Stokes, J.) the court found that Ms. Dean was the rightful owner of the property in dispute and that Mr. Bragdon had not met his burden of proving his claim of adverse possession. Mr. Bragdon did not appeal that ruling.

  3. Dean v. Bragdon

    SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-2018-195 (Me. Super. Mar. 16, 2020)

    See Pepperell Trust Co. v. Mountain Heir Fin. Corp., 1998 ME 46, ¶¶ 16-17, 708 A.2d 651. Dean filed this action on November 13, 2018, several months after this court issued its Decision and Judgment in the matter of Dean v. Bragdon, KEN-Dkt. No. CV-2016-229 (April 17, 2018) (Stokes, J.). In that matter, Ms. Dean sought a declaration that she held the right, title and interest in certain real estate in Vassalboro.