From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean v. Bedsole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 13, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-01567-MHH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Oct. 13, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-01567-MHH-SGC

10-13-2020

JAMES EDWARD DEAN, Petitioner, v. CAPTAIN RUSSELL BEDSOLE, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 24, 2020, the magistrate judge entered a report in which she recommended that the Court deny petitioner James Edward Dean's request for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 8). The magistrate judge notified the parties of their right to file objections within 14 days, (Doc. 8); no objections appear in the record.

A district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). A district judge must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also FED. R. CRIM. P. 59(b)(3) ("The district judge must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge's recommendation."). Although § 636(b)(1) "does not require the [district] judge to review an issue de novo if no objections are filed, it does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985).

The Court has reviewed the record and agrees that the Court should deny Mr. Dean's habeas petition. The Court notes that Mr. Dean's federal due process arguments seem to extend not only to the original sentence that Judge Simpson imposed but also to Judge Simpson's authority to hear his case. (Doc. 1, pp. 7-9, ¶¶ 5, 19). Because Mr. Dean did not raise a federal due process challenge to Judge Simpson's authority in his state court proceedings (Docs. 1-4, 1-6), he may not present the challenge now in this federal habeas proceeding. (Doc. 8).

After consideration of the record in this case, the Court adopts the magistrate judge's report and accepts her recommendations. By separate order, the Court will deny Mr. Dean's petition for habeas relief and dismiss his petition with prejudice. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

DONE and ORDERED this October 13, 2020.

/s/_________

MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dean v. Bedsole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 13, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-01567-MHH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Oct. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Dean v. Bedsole

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWARD DEAN, Petitioner, v. CAPTAIN RUSSELL BEDSOLE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-01567-MHH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Oct. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Broaden

. Dean v. Bedsole, No. 2:19-CV-1567-MHH-SGC, 2020 WL 6051339, at *4 (N.D. Ala. Aug. 24, 2020), report and…