From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 19, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-01851-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-01851-AP

10-19-2012

DOROTHY M. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant.

For Plaintiff : KENNETH J. SHAKESHAFT Shakeshaft Law Firm For Defendant : JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCIA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado DANIEL E. BURROWS Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration , Region VIII Office of General Counsel


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

KENNETH J. SHAKESHAFT

Shakeshaft Law Firm

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

J. BENEDICT GARCIA

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

DANIEL E. BURROWS

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration , Region VIII

Office of General Counsel

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 07/17/12

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 08/02/12

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 10/01/12

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 11/28/12

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 01/04/13

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 01/18/13

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: _____________
KENNETH J. SHAKESHAFT
Shakeshaft Law Firm
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY _____________
BY: DANIEL E. BURROWS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant


Summaries of

Dean v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 19, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-01851-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Dean v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY M. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 19, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-01851-AP (D. Colo. Oct. 19, 2012)