Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-01851-AP
10-19-2012
For Plaintiff : KENNETH J. SHAKESHAFT Shakeshaft Law Firm For Defendant : JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCIA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado DANIEL E. BURROWS Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration , Region VIII Office of General Counsel
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. SHAKESHAFT
Shakeshaft Law Firm
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCIA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
DANIEL E. BURROWS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration , Region VIII
Office of General Counsel
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 07/17/12
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 08/02/12
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 10/01/12
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the court.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 11/28/12
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 01/04/13
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 01/18/13
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
BY THE COURT
John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: _____________
KENNETH J. SHAKESHAFT
Shakeshaft Law Firm
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY _____________
BY: DANIEL E. BURROWS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant