From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean Tarry Corp. v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1980
78 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

September 29, 1980


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Planning Board of the Village of Tarrytown disapproving petitioner's application for site plan approval, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 31, 1980, which granted the petition, vacated and set aside the determination of the planning board and deemed the site plan to have been approved. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, proceeding dismissed, and matter remitted to the Planning Board of the Village of Tarrytown to make findings of fact in support of its determination. Petitioner initiated this article 78 proceeding to review and annul the decision of the planning board that, by a 3 to 2 vote, disapproved its site development plan for the construction of a six-story apartment building. Unfortunately the board failed to render findings, a prerequisite to a review of its determination. Therefore, the instant matter is remitted to the planning board to make the findings of fact which underlie its determination. Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur. [ 103 Misc.2d 435.]


Summaries of

Dean Tarry Corp. v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1980
78 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Dean Tarry Corp. v. Friedlander

Case Details

Full title:DEAN TARRY CORP., Respondent, v. STANLEY L. FRIEDLANDER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1980

Citations

78 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Hejna v. Planning Bd. of Vil. of Amityville

As to Petitioners' argument that the determination of Respondent AMITYVILLE (PLANNING BOARD) was arbitrary…

Dean Tarry Corp. v. Friedlander

The Appellate Division, however, reversed Justice Slifkin's decision and remanded the matter to the Planning…