From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dealto v. Keating

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 10, 1982
409 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1661.

February 10, 1982.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Stephen A. Weinstein, Orlando, and Joseph A. Rosier, Altamonte Springs, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.


ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER


Petitioner's motion for reconsideration of our denial of his petition for writ of prohibition was timely filed, and because the issue therein sought to be raised may again be argued to this court in an appeal or interlocutory appeal, we hereby clarify our original denial of the petition as follows: We deny the petition for writ of prohibition because of lack of jurisdiction. The possible violation of section 901.25(3), Florida Statutes (1981), does not deprive the lower court of its power to act in the case, and therefore prohibition is not an appropriate remedy.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dealto v. Keating

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 10, 1982
409 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Dealto v. Keating

Case Details

Full title:EMIL ALBERT DEALTO, PETITIONER, v. THE HONORABLE RICHARD B. KEATING, AS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 10, 1982

Citations

409 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)