From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deal v. Outback Steakhouse of Fla., L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 13, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-00904 (W.D. La. Mar. 13, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-00904

03-13-2020

PATRICIA DEAL, Plaintiff v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE OF FLORIDA, L.L.C., ET AL., Defendants


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Deal's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 10) and Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs (ECF No. 10) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mouton is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the recommendation to grant Bloomin' Brands' Motion to Amend/Correct the Notice of Removal (ECF No. 38) is DENIED AS MOOT.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in chambers in Alexandria, Louisiana on this 13th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Deal v. Outback Steakhouse of Fla., L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 13, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-00904 (W.D. La. Mar. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Deal v. Outback Steakhouse of Fla., L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA DEAL, Plaintiff v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE OF FLORIDA, L.L.C., ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-00904 (W.D. La. Mar. 13, 2020)