From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Young v. De Young

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Oct 14, 1948
338 Ill. App. 288 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

Gen. No. 10,242. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed October 14, 1948 Rehearing opinion filed July 7, 1949 Rehearing denied August 11, 1949 Released for publication August 15, 1949

DIVORCE, § 46when "separation by agreement" not defense. Husband's failure to make any objections when wife went home with her sister did not indicate a "separation by agreement," so as to preclude husband from obtaining a divorce for wilful desertion, where husband did not know that wife intended a permanent separation when she went to her sister's home.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. C.D. HENRY, Judge, presiding.

Decree affirmed. Heard in this court at the February term, 1949.

Samuel H. Shapiro and Lederer, Livingston, Kahn Adsit, for appellant;

Leo H. Arnstein and Richard C. Bleloch, of counsel;

Donald D. Zeglis, Ehrlich Cohn, and Eva L. Minor, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed October 14, 1948; rehearing opinion filed July 7, 1949; rehearing denied August 11, 1949; released for publication August 15, 1949.


Summaries of

De Young v. De Young

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Oct 14, 1948
338 Ill. App. 288 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

De Young v. De Young

Case Details

Full title:Joseph De Young, Appellee, v. Esther De Young, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District

Date published: Oct 14, 1948

Citations

338 Ill. App. 288 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
87 N.E.2d 134