Opinion
No. 58-88.
July 30, 1958.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Grady L. Crawford, Judge.
R.P. Terry, Miami, for appellant.
Boardman, Bolles, Davant Lloyd, Miami, for appellees.
Affirmed on authority of Armistead v. State ex rel. Smyth, Fla. 1949, 41 So.2d 879; Bradshaw v. Pinkston, Fla. 1951, 53 So.2d 525. See also Pippin v. State ex rel. Town of Blountstown, 73 Fla. 363, 74 So. 653, 655; and State ex rel. Burr v. Tavares G.R. Co., 78 Fla. 329, 82 So. 833, 835
CARROLL, CHAS., C.J., and HORTON, J., concur.
PEARSON, J., concurs specially.
While I agree that the discharge of the writ of mandamus was without error because the object sought to be accomplished was then moot, I feel that this final judgment was not determinative of all the issues in the cause. The petitioner should be left to such other remedy as may be available to her.