From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DE SANTIS v. SGAMBELLONE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1949
275 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

May 11, 1949.

Present — Taylor, P.J., Love, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.


Order and amended order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The application made was to vacate the order and warrant. Even though it be considered as a motion to open the default, the papers on which it was founded are insufficient. Such an application should have contained a proposed answer or, in the alternative, an offer to pay the accumulated rent, with costs, into court. As no answer was interposed, there was no issue to be tried and the order should have provided for the payment into court of the accumulated rent. Although we find it necessary to reverse the orders made, we see no reason why the court should not entertain a new application to open the default on proper papers. All concur. (The order and amended order vacate a final order and warrant of eviction previously granted to petitioner.)


Summaries of

DE SANTIS v. SGAMBELLONE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1949
275 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

DE SANTIS v. SGAMBELLONE

Case Details

Full title:CARL DE SANTIS, Appellant, v. JOSEPH SGAMBELLONE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 11, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Saledo Realty Corp. v. Allen

Moreover, the application made was to vacate the order and the warrant and even though it be considered as a…