From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Rienzo v. Zweig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 4, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the application is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The record amply supports the court's determination that the plaintiff engaged in deliberate misconduct by approaching jurors in a courthouse restroom during a recess in the trial and making an improper appeal to their sympathy. Nevertheless, while the imposition of an appropriate sanction may have been warranted (see generally, Judiciary Law §§ 750 Jud., 753 Jud.), the dismissal of the complaint under these circumstances was not authorized (see, Tewari v. Tsoutsouras, 75 N.Y.2d 1, 7; see generally, Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. Lezak, 69 N.Y.2d 1). Accordingly, the judgment must be reversed and the complaint reinstated.

Sullivan, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

De Rienzo v. Zweig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

De Rienzo v. Zweig

Case Details

Full title:TRACEY De RIENZO, Appellant, v. JULIAN ZWEIG, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
674 N.Y.S.2d 80