From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

de Oteris v. Mario

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 1946
270 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

February 18, 1946.


The complaint contains two causes of action, one for absolute divorce and the other to set aside a separation agreement. Defendant moved for an order (a) severing the causes of action and directing the service of an amended complaint; (b) in the alternative, dismissing the second cause of action because of improper joinder with the first cause of action; (c) in the alternative, directing plaintiff to separately state and number the several causes of action alleged in the second cause of action; (d) in the alternative, striking out paragraphs "Ninth" to "Twelfth", inclusive, under rules 102 and 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The motion was denied without prejudice to defendant's right to move for separate trials of the issues involved. Defendant appeals. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Nolan, JJ., concur. [ 185 Misc. 1029.]


Summaries of

de Oteris v. Mario

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 18, 1946
270 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

de Oteris v. Mario

Case Details

Full title:MAY DE OTERIS, Respondent, v. MIKE MARIO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 18, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Vatis v. Vatis

A motion for leave to serve a supplemental pleading is addressed to the discretion of the court (cf.…