From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Martino v. Pensavalle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 15, 1977
56 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

February 15, 1977


In an action, inter alia, to dissolve a partnership and for an accounting, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 17, 1976, as denied their motion for an "interlocutory decree requiring defendant to file a formal accounting". Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and plaintiffs' motion granted. Defendant shall serve and file the required accounting within 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, and plaintiffs shall serve and file their objections thereto within 10 days thereafter. Since a partnership between the parties has been judicially established, the plaintiffs are entitled to an accounting. A partnership may be dissolved at any time by any partner (Partnership Law, § 62; Napoli v Domnitch, 18 A.D.2d 707, affd 14 N.Y.2d 508). Latham, Acting P.J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

De Martino v. Pensavalle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 15, 1977
56 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

De Martino v. Pensavalle

Case Details

Full title:SANTO DE MARTINO et al., Appellants, v. ALFRED PENSAVALLE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 15, 1977

Citations

56 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Suffolk Cnty. Water Auth. v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc.

In contravention of the agreement between the partners, where the circumstance do not permit a dissolution…

Suffolk Cnty. Water Auth. v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc.

In contravention of the agreement between the partners, where the circumstances do not permit a dissolution…