From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DE LUCA v. KERWIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

May, 1933.


Order denying plaintiff's motion to vacate notice of examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the examination to proceed on five days' notice. The relationship of the witness to the plaintiff, the relation of the witness to the transactions out of which the general release sprang and the fact that the defendants are executors acting on behalf of a decedent are all special circumstances adequately justifying the examination of the witness before trial on behalf of the defendants. ( Manufacturers Trust Co. v. American Nat. Fire Ins. Co., 232 App. Div. 536; Bloede Co. v. Devine Co., 211 id. 180; Mayer v. New York Canners, Inc., 217 id. 202.) Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DE LUCA v. KERWIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

DE LUCA v. KERWIN

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINA MARINARO DE LUCA, Appellant, v. WALTER KERWIN and SAMUEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1933

Citations

239 App. Div. 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Sax v. Houston

Under the circumstances disclosed by the record, the defendants were entitled to have the discretion of the…

Rubel Corporation v. Rosoff

The plaintiffs-appellants established the existence of "special circumstances," within the meaning of section…