From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DE LANDA v. LUCOM

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 8, 1956
2 Misc. 2d 170 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Armbruster v. Brady (154 N.Y.S.2d 678) plaintiff and defendant were both residents of Westchester County where the paper was published.

Summary of this case from Scheinblum v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

March 8, 1956

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, County of New York, HAROLD BAER, J.

Michael J. Kenny and Charles M. Trammell for appellant.

Paul O'Dwyer and Howard N. Meyer for respondent.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Concur: HOFSTADTER, EDER and TILZER, JJ.

Summaries of

DE LANDA v. LUCOM

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 8, 1956
2 Misc. 2d 170 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)

In Armbruster v. Brady (154 N.Y.S.2d 678) plaintiff and defendant were both residents of Westchester County where the paper was published.

Summary of this case from Scheinblum v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.
Case details for

DE LANDA v. LUCOM

Case Details

Full title:JOSE DE LANDA, Respondent, v. VIRGINIA W. DE L. LUCOM, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1956

Citations

2 Misc. 2d 170 (N.Y. App. Term 1956)
154 N.Y.S.2d 678

Citing Cases

Scheinblum v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.

Cases cited by the defendant are readily distinguishable. In Armbruster v. Brady ( 154 N.Y.S.2d 678)…

1 Citing Cases