From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL SERV. v. THIRD PILLAR SYST

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 27, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2439 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 27, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2439.

August 27, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2010, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) the motion of defendant Third Pillar Systems, Inc. to amend its answer and counterclaim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

(2) the motion is GRANTED to the extent that defendant seeks to remove references to Counts III, IV, and V of the complaint, which the court dismissed on March 5, 2010, from its answer; and

(3) the motion is otherwise DENIED.


Summaries of

DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL SERV. v. THIRD PILLAR SYST

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 27, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2439 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 27, 2010)
Case details for

DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL SERV. v. THIRD PILLAR SYST

Case Details

Full title:DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL SERVICES, LLC v. THIRD PILLAR SYSTEMS, INC

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 27, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2439 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 27, 2010)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Kerry

"Reasons for denying a party's request for leave to amend its pleading include prejudice to the nonmoving…