From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De La Rosa v. Lam

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 23, 2024
19-cv-10317 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)

Opinion

19-cv-10317 (ER)

01-23-2024

DEDRA DE LA ROSA, Plaintiff, v. CYNTHIA LAM and FRANK LAM, as tenants by the entireties, and NECESSARY CLOTHING, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

Hie Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

De La Rosa v. Lam

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 23, 2024
19-cv-10317 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)
Case details for

De La Rosa v. Lam

Case Details

Full title:DEDRA DE LA ROSA, Plaintiff, v. CYNTHIA LAM and FRANK LAM, as tenants by…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 23, 2024

Citations

19-cv-10317 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)