From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De La Cruz v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Mar 5, 2012
Civil Action No. 01-10118-JLT (D. Mass. Mar. 5, 2012)

Summary

denying motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2255

Summary of this case from Barbosa v. Bruce Gelb Ctr.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 01-10118-JLT

03-05-2012

LUIS DE LA CRUZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

TAURO, J.

After considering Magistrate Judge Collings's Report and Recommendation on Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [#411] and Petitioner's Motion for Relief From Judgment in Light of the Government's Fraud on the Court Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Rule 60(b)(3) [#423] [#500] as well as Petitioner's Objections [#501] thereto, this court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [#500] for the reasons set forth therein.

Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence [#411] is hereby DENIED. Petitioner's Motion for Relief From Judgment in Light of the Government's Fraud on the Court [#423] is also DENIED. Accordingly, the remaining pending Motions [#409, 429, 447, 450, 451, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 467, 471, 472, 473, 498, 499] are DENIED. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Joseph L. Tauro

United States District Judge


Summaries of

De La Cruz v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Mar 5, 2012
Civil Action No. 01-10118-JLT (D. Mass. Mar. 5, 2012)

denying motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2255

Summary of this case from Barbosa v. Bruce Gelb Ctr.
Case details for

De La Cruz v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LUIS DE LA CRUZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Mar 5, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 01-10118-JLT (D. Mass. Mar. 5, 2012)

Citing Cases

Barbosa v. Bruce Gelb Ctr.

More importantly, this Court agrees with the First Circuit in Nardi and the Supreme Judicial Court's decision…